ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00049461
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Iulio Raoul Acasandrei | C & D Hospitality Ltd |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00060767-002 | 30/12/2023 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00060767-003 | 30/12/2023 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00060767-004 | 30/12/2023 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00060767-005 | 30/12/2023 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00060767-006 | 30/12/2023 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 11/04/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 and Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
The Complainant submitted the within claims on 30th of December 2023.
A Hearing of all claims was held on 11th of April 2024. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant was not in attendance at the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent was in attendance at the hearing. |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00060767-002 | 30/12/2023 |
Findings and Conclusions:
On review of the correspondence on file I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the hearing date and time. The complainant failed to attend the hearing to pursue his case. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the complaint should fail. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The Complainant offered no evidence and did not attend at the hearing. Accordingly, I declare this claim to be not well founded. |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00060767-003 | 30/12/2023 |
Findings and Conclusions:
On review of the correspondence on file I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the hearing date and time. The complainant failed to attend the hearing to pursue his case. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the complaint should fail. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The Complainant offered no evidence and did not attend at the hearing. Accordingly, I declare this claim to be not well founded. |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00060767-004 | 30/12/2023 |
Findings and Conclusions:
On review of the correspondence on file I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the hearing date and time. The complainant failed to attend the hearing to pursue his case. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the complaint should fail. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The Complainant offered no evidence and did not attend at the hearing. Accordingly, I declare this claim to be not well founded. |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00060767-005 | 30/12/2023 |
Findings and Conclusions:
On review of the correspondence on file I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the hearing date and time. The complainant failed to attend the hearing to pursue his case. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the complaint should fail. |
Decision:
Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 – 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the unfair dismissal claim consisting of a grant of redress in accordance with section 7 of the 1977 Act.
The Complainant did not attend at the hearing. Accordingly, I declare this claim to be not well founded. |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00060767-006 | 30/12/2023 |
Findings and Conclusions:
On review of the correspondence on file I am satisfied that the Complainant was notified of the hearing date and time. The complainant failed to attend the hearing to pursue his case. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the complaint should fail. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The Complainant did not attend at the hearing. Accordingly, I declare this claim to be not well founded. |
Dated: 02/08/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Orla Jones
Key Words:
|