Parties:
| Worker | Employer |
Anonymised Parties | A Worker | A Business Services Company |
Representatives | Did not attend. | Rebecca De Groot of Peninsula |
Dispute
Act | Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act,1969 | CA-00065303 | 01/04/2022 |
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Date of Hearing: 08/05/2024
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 (as amended) following the referral of the dispute to me by the Director General, I inquired into the dispute and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any information relevant to the dispute.
This matter was heard by way of remote hearing pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and SI 359/20206, which designates the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
1: Non-Appearance of Complainant
The Complainant did not attend the Hearing. The Adjudicator was satisfied that proper notice of the time, date and place of the Hearing had been properly served.
A period of some two weeks was allowed post the Hearing date for mitigation evidence in relation to the non-attendance to be proffered to the WRC. None was received.
2: Conclusions:
In conducting my investigation, I have taken into account all relevant submissions presented to me by the Parties.
As no evidence was presented the Dispute was deemed not Legally Proper Founded. No evidence-based Recommendation was possible.
|
3: Recommendation:
CA-00065303
Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1969 requires that I make a recommendation in relation to the dispute.
The Recommendation is that the Dispute be deemed closed.
Dated: 13.08.2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Michael McEntee
Key Words:
Non-Appearance of Parties. |