ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00047984
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Mariam Canahuate | Hegartys Supermarket |
Representatives |
|
|
Complaints:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00058971-001 | 21/09/2023 |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 27 of the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997 | CA-00058971-002 | 21/09/2023 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 07/02/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaints to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaints and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaints.
Background:
The Complainant filed her complaint with the Workplace Relations Commission 21 September 2023.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
There was no appearance by Complainant at the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
There was no appearance by Respondent at the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
After reviewing the file I am satisfied that the parties were on notice of the hearing date. I waited a reasonable amount of time but there was no appearance by either party. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaints in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I find that this complaint is dismissed for want of evidence from either side. |
Dated: 7th February 2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Key Words:
No appearance |