ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00047878
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Petru Mihaila | Ecokell |
Representatives | No Appearance | Dermot O’Kelly |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1991 | CA-00058988-001 | 23/09/2023 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 21/03/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
There was no appearance on behalf of the Complainant at the hearing. No correspondence or submissions were received from the Complainant by the Workplace Relations Commission.
An interpreter appeared to assist the Complainant.
The Respondent appeared with representation and witnesses. Submission and documentation were received in advance of the hearing.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
After waiting a reasonable period of time there was no appearance on behalf of the Complainant. I am satisfied that the Complainant was on notice of the hearing date based on the contact information he supplied in his complaint form. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent advised matters had been resolved. |
Findings and Conclusions:
On the basis there was no appearance by the Complainant, I find the complaint is not well founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I find the complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 27/03/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Úna Glazier-Farmer
Key Words:
Payment of Wages – No Appearance |