ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00049234
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Ann Rogers | Liffey Gaels Inn Ltd The Clock Pub |
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties |
|
|
Representatives | Stewart Reddin, Dublin South Citizens Information Service | Did not attend |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00060477-001 | 11/12/2023 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 12/03/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 - 2014 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant commenced employment on 01/09/1994 as a caterer working 15 hours per week. Employment ended on 19/02/2023. This complaint was received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 11th December 2023. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant was employed as bar catering staff at The Clock Pub on Thomas Street from 1994 until February 2023. Throughout her period of employment, the ownership of the pub changed hands on a number of occasions, however, her employment service was unbroken. In January 2023 her employer, Mr. Stephen Whelan, informed her that the pub had been sold. The Complainant asked her employer if she would be kept on by the new owner, but he was unable to provide her with information on this. The Complainant sought the assistance of her local Citizens Information Service (CIS). The CIS wrote to her employer in early February seeking clarification on her employment status. The pub ceased trading on Sunday 19 February 2023. The following week the Complainant received a cash payment of €1,000 from the manager who indicated that it represented payment of notice. However, she did not receive any formal written notice that her position was being made redundant. The Citizens Information Service wrote a further letter to her employer in early March regarding a redundancy payment. In early July the Complainant submitted a RP77 form to the employer. Several weekslaterMr.Whelancontacted her tosayhewaspreparingredundancyformswithhisaccountant. The Complainant did not receive any forms, or a redundancy payment from the employer. The Complainant contacted the employer in early August and was informed that he was seeking assistance in making the redundancy payment. The Complainant received no further correspondence from the employer.
|
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the scheduled hearing of the complaint. I am satisfied that the Respondent received written details of the hearing. |
Findings and Conclusions:
There can be no doubt that the complainant is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. Such payment should be based on the following calculation: Start Date: 01st September 1994. End date : 19th February 2023. Hours worked per week: 15 Weekly earnings: €236.13 I am also satisfied that the Complainant made every effort to obtain a redundancy payment from her former employer. I now order the Respondent to make this statutory redundancy payment to the Complainant within 42 days from the date of this decision. |
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
There can be no doubt that the complainant is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. I now order the Respondent to make this statutory redundancy payment to the Complainant within 42 days from the date of this decision. |
Dated: 09th of October 2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words:
Redundancy Payments Act 1967. |