ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00051274
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Shannon Greene | Proper Innovation Ltd The Merchant |
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | {text} | {text} |
Representatives |
| Michael Brennan |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00062814-003 | 15/04/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 08/08/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
The matter was heard by way of remote hearing on 8 August 2024, pursuant to the Civil Law and Criminal Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020 and S.I. 359/2020, which designated the WRC as a body empowered to hold remote hearings.
Background:
The Complainant was employed as a restaurant manager by the Respondent. Her employment commenced on 22 March 2024 and it ended on 14 of April 2024. A complaint was received by the WRC on 15 April 2024. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the hearing as they were attending another WRC hearing at the same time. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission from the Complainant on 15 April 2024 alleging that her employer former employer, the Respondent, contravened the provisions of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994, in relation to her. The said complaint was referred to me for investigation. A hearing for that purpose was held on 8 August 2024. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the Complainant at the hearing. I am satisfied that the said Complainant was informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having been adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly.
|
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
The complaint is not well founded. |
Dated: 10th of September 2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Roger McGrath
Key Words:
|