ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00054012
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Ruslan Pazuschin | San Siro Limited |
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties |
|
|
Representatives |
|
|
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 | CA-00065899-001 | 10/09/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 17/12/2024
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Penelope McGrath
Procedure:
Pursuant to Section 39 of the Redundancy Payment Act of 1967 (as amended) it is directed that the manner of hearing prescribed in Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act of 2015 shall apply to any question, dispute, complaint or appeal referred to the Director General under the Redundancy Payments Acts of 1967 – 2014.
I have accordingly been directed by the Director General of the Adjudication services, to hear the within complaint and I can confirm that I have fulfilled my obligation to make all relevant inquiries into the complaint. I have additionally and where appropriate heard the oral evidence of the parties and their witnesses and have taken account of the evidence tendered in the course of the hearing.
Under the Redundancy Payments Acts, an eligible employee who is found to be redundant is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment for every year of service (per Section 7 of the Redundancy Payment Act of 1967). The Acts provide for a payment of two weeks gross pay for each year of service. A further bonus week is added to this. An eligible employee is one with 104 weeks of continuous employment with an employer and whose position has ceased to exist. The calculation of Gross weekly pay is subject to a ceiling of €600.00. Gross pay is the current normal weekly pay including average regular overtime and benefits-in-kind and before tax and PRSI deductions. A Redundancy payment is generally tax free.
A complainant must be able to show a minimum two years (104 weeks) of service in the employment. The Complainant herein qualifies.
Responsibility to pay Statutory Redundancy rests with the Employer. Where an employer can prove to the satisfaction of the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection that it is unable to pay Statutory Redundancy to an eligible applicant, the Department will make payments directly to that employee and may seek to recover as against the Employer independently. Such claims must be submitted on form RP50 which may be signed by both employer and employee (to be accompanied with a Statement of Affairs).
In the event that an Employer refuses to engage with an employee in this way (as is the situation here), it is open to the employee to bring an appropriate complaint before the Workplace Relations Commission as set out in Section 38(15) of the 1967 Act.
The Employee must have made a claim for a redundancy payment by notice and in writing before the expiration of 52 weeks form the date of the cessation of the employment per section 24 of the Redundancy Payments Act 1967 (as amended). The time limit may be extended to 104 weeks where the employee can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Adjudication Officer that the failure to bring the claim in the earlier time period was due to reasonable cause (24(2A)).
Background:
This hearing was conducted in person in the Workplace Relations Commission situate in Lansdowne Road, Dublin. In line with the Supreme Court decision in the constitutional case of Zalewski -v- An Adjudication Officer and the Workplace Relations Commission and Ireland and the Attorney General [2021] IESC 24 (delivered on the 6th of April 2021) the hearing was conducted in recognition of the fact that the proceedings constitute the administration of Justice. It was therefore open to members of the public to attend this hearing.
The Specific Details of the Dispute are outlined in the Workplace Relations Complaint Form which was received by the WRC on the 10th of September 2024.
|
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant was not represented and made his own case. The Complainant provided me with corroborative evidence of his gross earnings in the form of payslips. The Complainant relied on the submission outlined in the Workplace Relations Complaint Form concerning the fact of Redundancy. The Complainant’s evidence was not challenged as no representations were made by or on behalf of the Respondent. The Complainant alleges that he was made redundant when the restaurant he had been working in for over twenty years was unexpectedly closed down over the Christmas period of 2023. The Complainant was never given any explanation, and the company Director Mr. Greg Browne refused to engage with the Complainant in the aftermath of the closure. Where it also became necessary, I explained how the Adjudication process operated with particular emphasis on the burden of proof which had to be attained by the Complainant in the first instance. Where I deemed it necessary, I made my own inquiries so as to better understand the facts of the case and in fulfilment of my duties as prescribed by Statute. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend. I am satisfied that the Respondent was notified of the date, time and venue for this hearing by a letter sent from the WRC and dated the 5th of November 2024. |
Findings and Conclusions:
From the evidence provided I am absolutely satisfied that the Complainant was engaged by the company known as San Siro Limited from the 4th of October 2003 to the 24th of December 2023. The Complainant was engaged as a head chef by the Company. After more than twenty years of service the Complainant’s employment was suddenly and abruptly terminated in December of 2023. The reasons for the termination were not made known to the Complainant but it seems that the restaurant closed down over the Christmas period of 2023. If the restaurant re-opened (which is not clear) there was no job available for the Complainant. The Complainant lost his position by reason of the insolvency of the restaurant owned and operated by San Siro Limited.
|
Decision:
Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 – 2012 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under that Act.
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 39 of the Redundancy Payments Act, 1967 CA-00065899-001 - I accept that the Complainant’s job was made redundant, and I accept that the Complainant was entitled to be paid redundancy pursuant to the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967-2014. The employment started: 4th October 2003 The employment ended: 24th December 2023 Gross weekly wage : €770.00 This award is made subject to the complainant having been in insurable employment under the Social Welfare Acts during the relevant period.
|
Dated: 18th February 2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Penelope McGrath
Key Words:
|