ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00053025
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Mario Guida | Mike Delta Mike Holdings Ltd. |
Representatives | N/A | N/A |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 of the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977 | CA-00064864-001 | 19/07/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 19/03/2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Monica Brennan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission on 19th July 2024. The complaint form stated that it was in relation to unfair dismissal.
A hearing was scheduled for 11.30am on Wednesday 19th March, 2025 in Lansdowne House, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4.
At the time the hearing was to commence, it was apparent that there was no attendance by or on behalf of either the Complainant or the Respondent. I verified that both parties were on notice of the date, time and venue of the hearing and waited some time to accommodate late arrivals. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the adjudication hearing and was not represented. Notice of the hearing arrangements was sent to the Complainant on 21st January 2025. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the adjudication hearing and was not represented. Notice of the hearing arrangements was sent to the Respondent on 21st January 2025. |
Findings and Conclusions:
The hearing was scheduled for 11.30am on Wednesday 19th March, 2025. At the appointed time, there was no appearance by either the Complainant or the Respondent. I satisfied myself that both parties were on notice of the date, time and location of the hearing. I allowed 20 minutes for the late arrival of either party. In the circumstances and in the absence of direct evidence, I must conclude that the complaint is not well-founded. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
As set out above, in all of the circumstances, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well-founded and I decide accordingly. |
Dated: 21st March 2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Monica Brennan
Key Words:
Non-appearance |