ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00054129
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Petrisor Ion | Deco |
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties |
|
|
Representatives | Did not attend | Company Management. |
Complaint(s):
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 7 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act, 1994 | CA-00065992-001 | 15/09/2024 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 03/03/2025
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The complainant contends that he was employed by the respondent from 19th February 2024 until 6th April 2024. This complaint was received by the Workplace Relations Commission on 15th September 2024. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The complainant did not attend the scheduled hearing of the complaint. I am satisfied that the complainant was notified in writing of the date, time and location for the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The respondent attended the scheduled hearing of the complaint and was prepared to present a full defence. |
Findings and Conclusions:
A complaint was received by the Director General of the Workplace Relations Commission on 15th September 2024 alleging that the named respondent, Deco Engineering, contravened the provisions of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 in relation to him. The said complaint was referred to me for investigation. A hearing for that purpose was held on 3rd March 2025. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the complainant at the hearing. I am satisfied that the said complainant was informed in writing of the date, time and place at which the hearing to investigate the complaint would be held. In these circumstances and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary having being adduced before me, I must conclude that the within complaint is not well – founded and I decide accordingly. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I must conclude that the within complaint is not well – founded and I decide accordingly. |
Dated: 05-03-25
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Jim Dolan
Key Words:
|