ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00063411
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Parties | Shane Deady | Stryker |
Representatives | No Appearance | No Appearance |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act, 1973 | CA-00076668-001 | 22/10/2025 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 08/07/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Thomas O'Driscoll
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015 following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint. Both the Complainant and Respondent did not attend the hearing though I am reasonably satisfied that both parties had notice of the arrangements for the hearing.
Background:
The Complainant submitted a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 12 of the Minimum Notice & Terms of Employment Act 1973 on 22 October 2025 |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
The Respondent did not attend the hearing |
Findings and Conclusions:
The Complainant did not attend the hearing. I am reasonably satisfied that he had notice of the arrangements for the hearing. Therefore, I find that the complaint was not well founded due to a lack of evidence. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
CA-00076668-001: I find the complaint was not well founded due to a lack of evidence. |
Dated: 29/07/2026
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Thomas O'Driscoll
Key Words:
No-Appearance. |